National vs. Local

Way back in May, Gert left a comment on a post I’d written about local elections.

And why on earth should national and international factors matter in local elections? Or are you saying people are too thick to understand democracy…which is a rather patronising view?

Now, at the time I wasn’t saying that at all. But when I look at certain politics stories, it’s certainly true that both the media and the various political parties do connect national and local politics in local elections.

You only have to look at yesterday’s stories about Gordon Brown postponing the 2p fuel duty rise – “The planned 2p fuel duty rise is postponed – but Gordon Brown denies the move is linked to next week’s by-election.” (the BBC’s summary paragraph)

And in last week’s by-election win by David Davis, the story carried a quote of “Mr Davis said: ‘We have fired a shot across the bows of Gordon Brown’s arrogant, arbitrary and authoritarian government.’

So yes, it certainly seems like there’s plenty of people who do connect up national and local elections and politics.


One Comment on “National vs. Local”

  1. Gert says:

    Ah, but Parliamentary by-elections, like General Elections, are to elect a representative to the UK Parliament from which the UK Government is formed, to make decisions on National (and, up to a point, International) issues, whereas Local Elections are to elect Local Government to decide on Local Issues 🙂


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *