Outsourced – part 2

On the subject of outsourcing etc., if you were to hire a company to maintain / sort out a website, would you chose…

a) A company whose website looked smooth, slick, didn’t have errors, and provided a professional image of themselves

or

b) A company whose website contains umpteen javascript errors, and whose main page just says “Under Construction”, with the contact details for the company. No “our clients”, no demos, no screenshots.

No prizes for guessing which lot AB went for…


One Comment on “Outsourced – part 2”

  1. Gordon says:

    You spoiled this post completely by posting the one after it…

    I WAS gonna say B but not.. it must’ve been A… right?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *